Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Local Models Support #143

Open
1 task done
mateobelanger opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

feat: Local Models Support #143

mateobelanger opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
model Relevant to new model providers or implementations

Comments

@mateobelanger
Copy link
Member

mateobelanger commented Dec 5, 2024

Feature Request

Motivation

We want to support local execution of LLMs. Starting with ollama.

Proposal

Alternatives

@mateobelanger mateobelanger added the model Relevant to new model providers or implementations label Dec 5, 2024
@mateobelanger mateobelanger added this to the v0.6 milestone Dec 5, 2024
@cvauclair cvauclair linked a pull request Dec 10, 2024 that will close this issue
@cvauclair cvauclair removed this from the v0.6 milestone Dec 19, 2024
@vacekj
Copy link

vacekj commented Dec 28, 2024

Local OpenAI inference is supported, including Ollama and LM Studio. Would it make sense to also support ollama's specific API? If so, would this be a new CompletionModel, or are these classified more as Tools?

@0xMochan
Copy link
Contributor

Local OpenAI inference is supported, including Ollama and LM Studio. Would it make sense to also support ollama's specific API? If so, would this be a new CompletionModel, or are these classified more as Tools?

Yes it makes a lot of sense, as written in #147! It would be a new provider that directly implements ollama's API. Feel free to take this on as apart of your existing PR or create a new issue and new PR that tracks that!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
model Relevant to new model providers or implementations
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants