Model: uniCOIL (with doc2query-T5 expansions)
This page describes regression experiments, integrated into Anserini's regression testing framework, using uniCOIL (with doc2query-T5 expansions) on the MS MARCO passage ranking task. The uniCOIL model is described in the following paper:
Jimmy Lin and Xueguang Ma. A Few Brief Notes on DeepImpact, COIL, and a Conceptual Framework for Information Retrieval Techniques. arXiv:2106.14807.
The exact configurations for these regressions are stored in this YAML file.
Note that this page is automatically generated from this template as part of Anserini's regression pipeline, so do not modify this page directly; modify the template instead and then run bin/build.sh
to rebuild the documentation.
From one of our Waterloo servers (e.g., orca
), the following command will perform the complete regression, end to end:
python src/main/python/run_regression.py --index --verify --search --regression msmarco-v1-passage.unicoil
We make available a version of the MS MARCO Passage Corpus that has already been processed with uniCOIL, i.e., we have applied doc2query-T5 expansions, performed model inference on every document, and stored the output sparse vectors. Thus, no neural inference is involved.
From any machine, the following command will download the corpus and perform the complete regression, end to end:
python src/main/python/run_regression.py --download --index --verify --search --regression msmarco-v1-passage.unicoil
The run_regression.py
script automates the following steps, but if you want to perform each step manually, simply copy/paste from the commands below and you'll obtain the same regression results.
Download the corpus and unpack into collections/
:
wget https://rgw.cs.uwaterloo.ca/JIMMYLIN-bucket0/data/msmarco-passage-unicoil.tar -P collections/
tar xvf collections/msmarco-passage-unicoil.tar -C collections/
To confirm, msmarco-passage-unicoil.tar
is 3.4 GB and has MD5 checksum 78eef752c78c8691f7d61600ceed306f
.
With the corpus downloaded, the following command will perform the remaining steps below:
python src/main/python/run_regression.py --index --verify --search --regression msmarco-v1-passage.unicoil \
--corpus-path collections/msmarco-passage-unicoil
Sample indexing command:
bin/run.sh io.anserini.index.IndexCollection \
-collection JsonVectorCollection \
-input /path/to/msmarco-passage-unicoil \
-generator DefaultLuceneDocumentGenerator \
-index indexes/lucene-inverted.msmarco-v1-passage.unicoil/ \
-threads 16 -impact -pretokenized -storeDocvectors \
>& logs/log.msmarco-passage-unicoil &
The path /path/to/msmarco-passage-unicoil/
should point to the corpus downloaded above.
The important indexing options to note here are -impact -pretokenized
: the first tells Anserini not to encode BM25 doclengths into Lucene's norms (which is the default) and the second option says not to apply any additional tokenization on the uniCOIL tokens.
Upon completion, we should have an index with 8,841,823 documents.
For additional details, see explanation of common indexing options.
Topics and qrels are stored here, which is linked to the Anserini repo as a submodule. The regression experiments here evaluate on the 6980 dev set questions; see this page for more details.
After indexing has completed, you should be able to perform retrieval as follows:
bin/run.sh io.anserini.search.SearchCollection \
-index indexes/lucene-inverted.msmarco-v1-passage.unicoil/ \
-topics tools/topics-and-qrels/topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.unicoil.tsv.gz \
-topicReader TsvInt \
-output runs/run.msmarco-passage-unicoil.unicoil-cached_q.topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.unicoil.txt \
-impact -pretokenized &
Evaluation can be performed using trec_eval
:
bin/trec_eval -c -m map tools/topics-and-qrels/qrels.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.txt runs/run.msmarco-passage-unicoil.unicoil-cached_q.topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.unicoil.txt
bin/trec_eval -c -M 10 -m recip_rank tools/topics-and-qrels/qrels.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.txt runs/run.msmarco-passage-unicoil.unicoil-cached_q.topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.unicoil.txt
bin/trec_eval -c -m recall.100 tools/topics-and-qrels/qrels.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.txt runs/run.msmarco-passage-unicoil.unicoil-cached_q.topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.unicoil.txt
bin/trec_eval -c -m recall.1000 tools/topics-and-qrels/qrels.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.txt runs/run.msmarco-passage-unicoil.unicoil-cached_q.topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.unicoil.txt
With the above commands, you should be able to reproduce the following results:
AP@1000 | uniCOIL (with doc2query-T5 expansions) |
---|---|
MS MARCO Passage: Dev | 0.3574 |
RR@10 | uniCOIL (with doc2query-T5 expansions) |
MS MARCO Passage: Dev | 0.3516 |
R@100 | uniCOIL (with doc2query-T5 expansions) |
MS MARCO Passage: Dev | 0.8609 |
R@1000 | uniCOIL (with doc2query-T5 expansions) |
MS MARCO Passage: Dev | 0.9582 |
The above runs are in TREC output format and evaluated with trec_eval
.
In order to reproduce results reported in the paper, we need to convert to MS MARCO output format and then evaluate:
python tools/scripts/msmarco/convert_trec_to_msmarco_run.py \
--input runs/run.msmarco-passage-unicoil.unicoil.topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.unicoil.txt \
--output runs/run.msmarco-passage-unicoil.unicoil.topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.unicoil.tsv --quiet
python tools/scripts/msmarco/msmarco_passage_eval.py \
tools/topics-and-qrels/qrels.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.txt \
runs/run.msmarco-passage-unicoil.unicoil.topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.unicoil.tsv
The results should be as follows:
#####################
MRR @10: 0.35155222404147896
QueriesRanked: 6980
#####################
This corresponds to the effectiveness reported in the paper and also the run named "uniCOIL-d2q" on the official MS MARCO Passage Ranking Leaderboard, submitted 2021/09/22.
Reproduction Log*
To add to this reproduction log, modify this template and run bin/build.sh
to rebuild the documentation.
- Results reproduced by @lintool on 2021-06-28 (commit
1550683
) - Results reproduced by @JMMackenzie on 2021-07-02 (commit
e4c5127
) - Results reproduced by @amallia on 2021-07-14 (commit
dad4b82
) - Results reproduced by @ArvinZhuang on 2021-07-16 (commit
43ad899
) - Results reproduced by @yuki617 on 2022-02-16 (commit
c7614d2
) - Results reproduced by @mayankanand007 on 2022-02-23 (commit
6a70804
) - Results reproduced by @manveertamber on 2022-02-25 (commit
7472d86
) - Results reproduced by @lintool on 2022-06-06 (commit
236b386
)