You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hi ,there is a problem which confuse me a few of days .i run code as follows:
res = irt(data)
i check many items in the data. when the beta is smaller such as -1.9,-2 , but the liked rate of this item is very low which i think it should be more large.when the beta is bigger such as 1.9 , 2 ,but the liked rate of this item is very high which i think it should be smaller. could anyone explain sth to me when the beta is large ,the liked rate should be large or smaller. note: the liked rate equals the number of "1" divide all numbers of items .
the format of the data is as follows :
customer_id
product_id
liked
1086992
14
1
1112695
14
0
1112695
17
1
803222
18
1
1110363
19
0
273880
19
1
445253
19
0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think there is a mistake in the library (maybe the real b is -b).
I ran this toy example to check. Clearly, the first question was the hardest since everyone correctly evaluated it, and the second one was the hardest since they all missed it.
Since $a_i>0$ given a fixed value for subject ability, $\theta_j$, higher values of $b_i$ should result in a lower probability of people getting the answer right. But that's not the case here.
hi ,there is a problem which confuse me a few of days .i run code as follows:
res = irt(data)
i check many items in the data. when the beta is smaller such as -1.9,-2 , but the liked rate of this item is very low which i think it should be more large.when the beta is bigger such as 1.9 , 2 ,but the liked rate of this item is very high which i think it should be smaller. could anyone explain sth to me when the beta is large ,the liked rate should be large or smaller. note: the liked rate equals the number of "1" divide all numbers of items .
the format of the data is as follows :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: