Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: typos #2329

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025
Merged

fix: typos #2329

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

wangdan-fit2cloud
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it?

Summary of your change

Please indicate you've done the following:

  • Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
  • Made sure commit message follow the rule of Conventional Commits specification.
  • Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 19, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@wangdan-fit2cloud wangdan-fit2cloud merged commit 33c07fd into main Feb 19, 2025
4 checks passed
@wangdan-fit2cloud wangdan-fit2cloud deleted the pr@main/chat-style branch February 19, 2025 07:51
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ function downloadFile(item: any) {
onMounted(() => {})
</script>
<style lang="scss" scoped>
.qustion-content {
.question-content {
display: flex;
justify-content: flex-end;

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code is generally clear, but there are some minor improvements and potential adjustments to consider:

### Potential Improvements:
1. **Consistent Naming Convention**: Ensure consistent use of capitalization (e.g., `qustion-content` should be `question-content`) across the template tags.

2. **CSS Flexbox Layout**: The existing flexbox layout does not require changing properties that might need adjustment depending on specific usage context or future changes in design requirements.

3. **Functionality Verification**: Ensure that the `downloadFile` function and its logic (`onMounted`) work correctly within the application's context.

4. **Whitespace Consistency**: Minor whitespace inconsistencies could be improved for better readability (though they are already fairly uniform).

5. **Accessibility Considerations**: If this component handles user interactions or content presentation, ensure it adheres to accessibility guidelines, such as providing appropriate ARIA roles and attributes where needed.

### Suggestions:
1. **Naming Consistency**:

-qustion-content


2. **Flexbox Property Adjustments**:
- Since the current properties (`display: flex`, `justify-content: flex-end`) seem appropriate given the context, no major changes are needed here unless additional styling requirements arise later on.

3. **Functionality Testing**:
- Add detailed test cases if testing functions like `downloadFile` to ensure all edge cases are handled properly.

4. **Whitespace Formatting**:
- Continue maintaining consistent indentation to enhance readability.

5. **Accessibility Checks**:
- Review the HTML structure to confirm that elements have appropriate role and aria-labels if necessary.

These points cover general maintenance considerations and may require further customization based on broader project needs and development practices.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants