Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider using Conium rather than SWANK-BACKEND #27

Open
luismbo opened this issue Oct 8, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

Consider using Conium rather than SWANK-BACKEND #27

luismbo opened this issue Oct 8, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@luismbo
Copy link

luismbo commented Oct 8, 2014

There isn't much of a focus to keep the SWANK API stable beyond the needs of SLIME itself. Have you considered using Conium instead?
@dkochmanski dkochmanski mentioned this issue Jan 14, 2017
Closed
scymtym pushed a commit to scymtym/log4cl that referenced this issue Jul 1, 2019
@dkochmanski
Merge pull request 7max#27 from sharplispers/cleanup
3037934 
Cleanup: improve asd files, move sources, fix typos, whitespace cleanup etc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@luismbo