Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Line numbers printed in acknowledgements environment even when line numbering is disabled #158

Open
adadams opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@adadams
Copy link

adadams commented Dec 12, 2023

This appears to be limited to AASTeX 6.3.1. For example, if using preprint mode, line numbers will still be printed within the acknowledgements environment.

(Important for those using the template to submit preprints to arXiv, as they will auto-reject the submissions for any line numbers.)

@augustfly
Copy link
Member

Thanks. Do the workarounds in #130 help?

@augustfly
Copy link
Member

The best solution is to use

\section*{Acknowledgments}

and avoids the otherwise compound fractures in the \acknowledgements command. This only complicates easy anonymizing of manuscripts for those wishing to do that.

@adadams
Copy link
Author

adadams commented Dec 21, 2023 via email

@zingale
Copy link

zingale commented Mar 21, 2024

just a note: arXiv is rejecting papers with this bug now.

@augustfly
Copy link
Member

Yeah, that was the prompt for the initial topic and for #130. AASTEX 7 is under dev that will hopefully iron out these things. FWIW, there are also reports of a moderator rejecting submissions bc figures or tables float in to the references. If anyone can find and share an itemized list of arXiv rejection and/or quality control criteria, then I'd really appreciate it.

@mtbannister
Copy link

Confirming that this arXiv rejection continues as of 2024-11-22. Not ideal since it doesn't show up in the arXiv validation steps!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants