Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Radiation balance #34

Open
MartinDix opened this issue Sep 30, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Radiation balance #34

MartinDix opened this issue Sep 30, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@MartinDix
Copy link

Latest CM3 runs (e.g. cm3-run-16-09-2024) have a net TOA energy flux around 2.7 W/m^2 initially.

Met Office GC5 AMIP runs were tuned to give the desired radiation balance at N216, not N96. The tuning is described at https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/gmed/wiki/ticket/573/TicketDetails describes the radiation tuning of the N216 version.

This is an extract of the table near the end of https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/gmed/wiki/ticket/577/TicketSensitivityTests

rsut rlut net
Obs CERES EBAF 4.1 99.0 240.3 +1.0
N96 RC3 98.56 239.53 +2.31
N216 RC3 99.07 240.59 +0.74

RC3 is almost the same as the final version, except for an update to the boundary layer buoyancy https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/jules/ticket/1242.

Alejandro Bodas's presentation at the 2023 Momentum Workshop says they retuned the GC5-N96ORCA1 PI control aiming at rsut=99, rlut=240.5, close to CERES EBAF4 values (because UKESM suggested PI and current were pretty close). Used two_d_fsd_factor = 1.70, cape_timescale =2700 s in place of standard two_d_fsd_factor=1.65 cape_timescale=1800.0, though not clear if this is the final value.

@MartinDix
Copy link
Author

MartinDix commented Oct 21, 2024

The Met Office n96orca1 PI control, e.g. u-ct598, instead tunes some cloud ice detrainment parameters. Compared to the AMIP configuration we've used until now changed parameters are

Parameter AMIP PI control
cff_spread 1.0e-5 1.0e-10
tice 263.15 253.15
starticeTKelvin 263.15 265.15
alliceTdeg -20 -32
two_d_fsd_factor 1.65 1.67

From the UM metadata

  • cff_spread_rate: Ice cloud fraction spreading rate
    When the effects of shear on falling ice cloud are either ignored or derived from model winds, this controls the rate at which ice cloud fraction spreads.

  • starticetkelvin: Start detraining condensate as ice at (Kelvin)
    When the method for coupling PC2 to convection scheme is 3 or later, this sets the temperature at which detraining condensate as ice begins.

  • allicetdegc: All condensate is detrained as ice by (deg C)
    When the method for coupling PC2 to convection scheme is 3 or later, this sets the temperature at which all condensate has detrained to ice.

  • tice: Specify phase change temperature /K
    Use a phase change other than 0 degrees - choose this if running with PC2. The value commonly used with PC2 is 263.15.

  • two_d_fsd_factor: Factor to convert 1D FSD for straight line to 2D value
    Current parametrizations of FSD (fractional standard deviation, a measure of subgrid variability) of cloud water content used in radiation and microphysics schemes are based on observations taken in a 1D line. For the UM we require the FSD for a 2D gridbox, which is generally larger. We account for this difference by multiplying the 1D fsd by this value.

@kieranricardo
Copy link
Collaborator

Run cm3-run-29-10-2024-radiation-balance with two_d_fsd_factor = 1.70, cape_timescale =2700 didn't show any improvement.

Run cm3-run-06-11-2024-radiation-balance-ice-detrainment with ice detrainment started.

@kieranricardo kieranricardo self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
@kieranricardo
Copy link
Collaborator

kieranricardo commented Nov 18, 2024

TOA flux not looking promising over 5 years. I've extended the run, and it's currently running for 20 years. Image

@MartinDix
Copy link
Author

Changes in the right direction, but only a small improvement from these parameters in an AMIP run.

Std New options CERES
rsut 98.41 98.84 98.93
rlut 239.62 239.82 240.35
net 2.37 1.74

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants