-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Radiation balance #34
Comments
The Met Office n96orca1 PI control, e.g. u-ct598, instead tunes some cloud ice detrainment parameters. Compared to the AMIP configuration we've used until now changed parameters are
From the UM metadata
|
Run Run |
Changes in the right direction, but only a small improvement from these parameters in an AMIP run.
|
Latest CM3 runs (e.g.
cm3-run-16-09-2024
) have a net TOA energy flux around 2.7 W/m^2 initially.Met Office GC5 AMIP runs were tuned to give the desired radiation balance at N216, not N96. The tuning is described at https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/gmed/wiki/ticket/573/TicketDetails describes the radiation tuning of the N216 version.
This is an extract of the table near the end of https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/gmed/wiki/ticket/577/TicketSensitivityTests
RC3 is almost the same as the final version, except for an update to the boundary layer buoyancy https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/jules/ticket/1242.
Alejandro Bodas's presentation at the 2023 Momentum Workshop says they retuned the GC5-N96ORCA1 PI control aiming at rsut=99, rlut=240.5, close to CERES EBAF4 values (because UKESM suggested PI and current were pretty close). Used
two_d_fsd_factor = 1.70, cape_timescale =2700 s
in place of standardtwo_d_fsd_factor=1.65 cape_timescale=1800.0
, though not clear if this is the final value.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: