Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question on the source of commonsense_15k #69

Open
clarenceluo78 opened this issue May 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Question on the source of commonsense_15k #69

clarenceluo78 opened this issue May 18, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@clarenceluo78
Copy link

Hi there, thanks for your work! I want to inquire about the source of the commonsense_15k dataset, as I didn't find it in the paper nor described in this repo.

@HZQ950419
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,

The commonsense_15k is sampled from the commonsense_170k for debugging. The results reported in the paper are based on commonsense_170k.

@AaronZLT
Copy link

Hi, @HZQ950419 , just curious about whether the math_50k.json, contains all slices of the other math_**k.json? What math dataset (math_**k.json) should I use if I'm conducting finetuning :)

@HZQ950419
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @AaronZLT , I recommend to use math_10k, math_7, or math_14k to do fine-tuning. In order to reproduce the result in README, you need to use math_10k. math_50k is an experimental dataset for ourside, which is not recommend to use for your experiments. And math_50k doesn't contain the samles of other math_**k.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants