Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linker Ideas #127

Open
simisimon opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Linker Ideas #127

simisimon opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@simisimon
Copy link
Member

Our evaluation showed that the equality-based linker often creates links which do not make sense. This is often the case when type information about the value nodes to be linked is missing. However, the Stack Overflow analysis and the commit history analysis shows showed us kinds of links between different technologies (e.g. Maven and Docker) or due to specific configuration types (e.g., version number).

Hence, we should probably move away from a equality-based linker. Instead, we could focus on technology-specific linker or dependency-specific linker. This way, we allow developer not only to develop their own plugins but also to implement their own linker. Otherwise, we need to improve the equality-based linker, for example by allowing only links between options whose values are equal. This way we would exclude links between options without type information, which should significantly reduce the number of links.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant