You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The reason for an issue vs a opening a PR is that I am not 100% sure because it seems to make no difference when I run the shock-cylinder case. Thoughts @asalmgren ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Marc, i have looked over the code and i believe you are correct. go ahead and submit a PR. this only does something when equation for total energy gives bad results. It may well never be used in a shock-cylinder case. Usually associated with hypersonic stuff from astrophysics or cosmology
I think that the line here: https://github.com/AMReX-Fluids/CAMR/blob/development/Source/Hydro/Hydro_utils_eb_K.H#L107
should be:
divu(i,j,k,UEINT) -= pdivu;
. And similarly for this line: https://github.com/AMReX-Fluids/CAMR/blob/development/Source/Hydro/Hydro_utils_eb_K.H#L156, it should bedivu(i,j,k,UEINT) -= ...
. And similarly for the 3D version in that function (4 spots total).This would make things consistent with the non-EB version:
CAMR/Source/Hydro/Hydro_utils_K.H
Line 256 in 6062c91
The reason for an issue vs a opening a PR is that I am not 100% sure because it seems to make no difference when I run the shock-cylinder case. Thoughts @asalmgren ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: