Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Any plans to support NAM format? #45

Open
guilhermehubner opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Any plans to support NAM format? #45

guilhermehubner opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@guilhermehubner
Copy link

Hello, just a question if there are any plans to support NAM https://github.com/sdatkinson/neural-amp-modeler format. It would be amazing addition for this plugin I would say.
@MaxPayne86
Copy link
Contributor

Since we're based on RTNeural, once RTNeural implements NAM architecture, then we will be able to support it out of the box. Related to: jatinchowdhury18/RTNeural#143.

At the same time, I would also ask: are you sure that RNNs are not enough for this purpose? For example, I have seen very good performance with GRU-12-3 or LSTM-12-3.

@MaxPayne86 MaxPayne86 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 26, 2024
@guilhermehubner
Copy link
Author

@MaxPayne86 thanks for your response. The performance is indeed amazing, but honestly speaking I am finding hard time finding captures for AIDA-X while NAM is widely available and accessible. That is the reason why I believe it would be amazing if this plugin would add support for it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@guilhermehubner @MaxPayne86