You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Related to a bullet point from this comment on the potential bulk RNA-seq changes inspired by 2020 May and 2020 June trainings issue #240,
We should run two gastric samples for the bulk RNA-seq material since everyone is now similarly equipped using RStudio Server, and participants would typically have more than one sample that they want to process, thus giving them a better starting point.
Also from that bullet point, we should consider
using a Makefile instead of a bash script for this per advice someone gave @cgreene
Edit: We should consider using Snakemake instead of a bash script.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A later comment on the issue being broken up was essentially "Josh said to use snakemake instead."
Ah yes:
Forgot to note that during some discussion @jashapiro thinks Snakemake in the absence of wildcards is easier to learn than Make
That comment appeared to be a bit lonesome to me at first glance and I forgot to take another whack at connecting it to its related point before closing that issue. Updating the original comment on this issue 👍
Related to a bullet point from this comment on the potential bulk RNA-seq changes inspired by 2020 May and 2020 June trainings issue #240,
We should run two gastric samples for the bulk RNA-seq material since everyone is now similarly equipped using RStudio Server, and participants would typically have more than one sample that they want to process, thus giving them a better starting point.
Also from that bullet point, we should consider
Edit: We should consider using Snakemake instead of a bash script.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: