Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the code displays the not good results unlike the paper #13

Open
Harrison-cc opened this issue Jan 9, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

the code displays the not good results unlike the paper #13

Harrison-cc opened this issue Jan 9, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@Harrison-cc
Copy link

INFO: TEST performance at epoch 155 --- Precision: 0.320000, Recall: 0.285714, Micro-F1: 0.301887, Macro-F1: 0.032500, Loss: 0.396801.
INFO: TEST performance at epoch 134 --- Precision: 0.428571, Recall: 0.321429, Micro-F1: 0.367347, Macro-F1: 0.052500, Loss: 0.408921.

@JianhuanZhuo
Copy link

JianhuanZhuo commented Jul 4, 2023

Test on the original code without big changes
The result is:

WARNING: Performance has not been improved for 50 epochs, updating learning rate
WARNING: Learning rate update 0.0001--->0.0001
WARNING: Performance has not been improved for 50 epochs, stopping train with early stopping
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:00<00:00, 1.36it/s]
INFO: TEST performance at epoch 73 --- Precision: 0.750000, Recall: 0.214286, Micro-F1: 0.333333, Macro-F1: 0.021429, Loss: 0.418117.

100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:00<00:00, 1.34it/s]
INFO: TEST performance at epoch 155 --- Precision: 0.391304, Recall: 0.321429, Micro-F1: 0.352941, Macro-F1: 0.046786, Loss: 0.385901.

Any help?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants