Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to obtain quantitative metrics #45

Open
ccruizm opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

How to obtain quantitative metrics #45

ccruizm opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ccruizm
Copy link

ccruizm commented Dec 7, 2022

Good day,

I like how accurate and fast the tool is! The pipeline assigns which cells are likely to be normal and which are malignant. I would like to know whether there is a way to score the cells based on the inferred presence or absence of CNV. Something similar to the approach described by Neftel et al 2019, quote directly: '...scored each cell for two CNA-based measures. ‘‘CNA signal’’ reflects the overall extent of CNAs, defined as the mean of the squares of CNA values across the genome. ‘‘CNA correlation’’ refers to the correlation between the CNA profile of each cell and the average CNA profile of all cells from the corresponding tumor, except for those classified by gene expression as non-malignant.' Is any info obtained from SCEVAN that could be used to compute those metrics?

Thanks in advance for your help!

@AntonioDeFalco AntonioDeFalco self-assigned this Feb 20, 2023
@AntonioDeFalco AntonioDeFalco added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 20, 2023
@Ilarius
Copy link

Ilarius commented Apr 29, 2024

Hello, maybe this could be computed from the value used for the generation of the heatmap. @AntonioDeFalco what do you think? It would be really nice to have a score, instead of a dicothomized value.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants