You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is probably not a good idea to italicize ∏ (U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT) in URW Bookman. At least, it should be consistent with ∑ (U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION). Nimbus Sans, Nimbus Sans Narrow, Nimbus Mono PS mess up baseline or size of these glyphs.
Also in URW Bookman, ϕ (U+03D5 GREEK PHI SYMBOL) is identical to φ (U+03C6 GREEK SMALL LETTER PHI). Usually the former has a closed form. This distinction might be important in some math formulas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
apodtele
changed the title
Discordant ∏ (U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT) and ∑ (U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION)
Discordant ∏ (U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT) and ∑ (U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION), etc
Feb 10, 2023
It is probably not a good idea to italicize ∏ (U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT) in URW Bookman. At least, it should be consistent with ∑ (U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION). Nimbus Sans, Nimbus Sans Narrow, Nimbus Mono PS mess up baseline or size of these glyphs.
Also in URW Bookman, ϕ (U+03D5 GREEK PHI SYMBOL) is identical to φ (U+03C6 GREEK SMALL LETTER PHI). Usually the former has a closed form. This distinction might be important in some math formulas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: