Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only few files are extracted #25

Open
ZhaojinChen opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Only few files are extracted #25

ZhaojinChen opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@ZhaojinChen
Copy link

I follow the pipeline to do quality control for my raw fMRI data. There are 29 subjects' data files while only 4 are extracted. Besides, only 2 files get the voting results.

I'm wondering whether there are any problems for the data extraction process for raw data. And in the voting process, why did the other two files lose their voting results?

Thanks for your effort!

@arefks
Copy link
Collaborator

arefks commented Jan 7, 2025

The issue might arise from multiple reasons that require step-by-step checking of the data, such as the Paravision version, sequence type, folder structure, etc. I suggest (for the fastest way to get results) transforming your data to NIfTI first (you can do this using any method you know, or by using our AIDAmri conv2nifti script) and then running AIDAqc on the NIfTI files. The current version of AIDAqc works much more stably on NIfTI data.
For the voting list, note that only subjects with at least one vote will be listed. Therefore, any file not in the list was not flagged by any of the outlier detection algorithms. For further questions, I suggest joining our open office hours to discuss this in more detail 😊.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants