Flex Consumption plan without FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION breaks function app

[erwinkramer]

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-app-settings#flex-consumption-plan-deprecations tells us that FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION is not needed anymore.

Removing FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION breaks my function app with message We were not able to load some functions in the list due to errors. Refresh the page to try again. See details (no details). Just adding FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION back again with value ~4 solves it.

If you look at the docs here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/templates/microsoft.web/sites?pivots=deployment-language-bicep#functionsruntime - it specifies: Function app runtime version. Example: 8 (for dotnet-isolated) - but how is version 8 of dot net (which you should specify there) related to function runtime 4? There is no relation and thus FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION is still needed (as i've proven by breaking it).

Investigative information

Please provide the following:

• Timestamp: 1-1-2025
• Region: north europe

Repro steps

Run with bicep:

resource functionApp 'Microsoft.Web/sites@2024-04-01' = {
  name: name
  location: location
  kind: 'functionapp,linux'
  tags: tags
  identity: {
     type: 'SystemAssigned'
  }
  properties: {
    httpsOnly: true
    publicNetworkAccess: 'Disabled'
    serverFarmId: appServicePlanId
    functionAppConfig: {
      deployment: {
        storage: {
          type: 'blobContainer'
          value: '${storage.properties.primaryEndpoints.blob}${deploymentStorageContainerName}'
          authentication: {
            type: 'SystemAssignedIdentity'
          }
        }
      }
      scaleAndConcurrency: {
        maximumInstanceCount: maximumInstanceCount
        instanceMemoryMB: instanceMemoryMB
      }
      runtime: { 
        name: functionAppRuntime
        version: dotNetVersion
      }
    }
    siteConfig: {
      publicNetworkAccess: 'Disabled'
      vnetName: vnetName
      functionAppScaleLimit: maximumInstanceCount
      cors: {
        allowedOrigins: [
          'https://portal.azure.com'
        ]
        supportCredentials: false
      }
    }
    virtualNetworkSubnetId: appServicePlanSubnetId
  }

and environment settings:

resource appSettings 'Microsoft.Web/sites/config@2024-04-01' = {
  name: 'appsettings'
  parent: functionApp
  properties: {
    AzureWebJobsStorage__accountName: storage.name
    FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION: '~4' // is still needed for flex plan, unlike what the docs tell you
    WEBSITE_USE_PLACEHOLDER_DOTNETISOLATED: '1'
    APPLICATIONINSIGHTS_CONNECTION_STRING: appInsightsConnectionString
  }
}

Expected behavior

Should work when leaving out FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION as the docs say.

Actual behavior

Gives message We were not able to load some functions in the list due to errors. Refresh the page to try again. See details

Related information

I'm using this to deploy functions (because the original task for normal function apps doesn't seem to work either (with the flex option enabled):

 - task: FuncToolsInstaller@0
    inputs:
      version: 'latest'

  - task: AzurePowerShell@5
    displayName: Azure Function App Deploy
    inputs:
      azureSubscription: SC-abc
      azurePowerShellVersion: LatestVersion
      ScriptType: "InlineScript"
      Inline: |
        cd "$(Pipeline.Workspace)/drop/dotnet"
        func azure functionapp publish "func-hello-abc" --dotnet-isolated

[JAdluri]

Hello @erwinkramer Thank you for reporting this issue. Will investigate furtherly and come back.

[nzthiago]

That app setting should not be needed for Flex Consumption, so we'd have to investigate further. Can you also share the bicep section that's creating Microsoft.Web/serverfarm?

[erwinkramer]

sure, here you go:

resource plan 'Microsoft.Web/serverfarms@2024-04-01' = {
  name: name
  tags: tags
  location: location
  kind: 'functionapp'
  sku: {
    tier: 'FlexConsumption'
    name: 'FC1'
  }
  properties: { 
    reserved: true
  }

[nzthiago]

@erwinkramer That all looks correct, thank you. We would need the function name to be able to investigate. Here's instructions on how to share the function app name privately.

[nzthiago]

@erwinkramer following up on this, any chance you could please share? We would love to investigate, and if this is a bug on our side we want to fix it.

[erwinkramer]

@nzthiago you can check func-hello-bootstrap-dev-001.

[mohaemen]

@erwinkramer any chance you can share the project file of your app?

[nzthiago]

@erwinkramer and others - @CooperLink and I are investigating, thank you for your patience. We will reply here when we identify if there's any gaps for us to close so that FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION is truly not needed.