You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it would be a plus if the output of MONET would be compatible with cytoscape input. In this way we could better visualize the network modules.
Thank you.
Best Regards, José
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since the output of the three methods is homogenized, a common conversion script to all of them could be added to MONET, and even executed at the end of each method. However, which one is a compatible format for cytoscape? The link before was about networks, not partitions. Do we have to annotate the network with the partition? It seems an inefficient solution.
I imagined we would create a cystoscope network for each partition outputted by MONET - each partition would be visualized separately. This should not be hard?
Please prepare an example of the desired output for a small network (e.g. 10 nodes) and the corresponding partition, I'm not familiar with cytoscape (and indicate the differences in format between directed and undirected networks).
Should be easy, but I hope not to repeat the work three times. Each method has a script file to which we could add the call to make the conversion, e.g. with a python function, and triggered by a command-line option to decide whether to make the conversion or not.
I think it would be a plus if the output of MONET would be compatible with cytoscape input. In this way we could better visualize the network modules.
Thank you.
Best Regards, José
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: