Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

BIP 176 ("bits"), explaining why introducing another sub-unit still forces users to think in decimals and multiple denominations. By adopting an integer-only display, we can provide a clearer, more intuitive, and ultimately more durable representation of Bitcoin’s value.   #9

Open
MORTEZAMIRSALI opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

BIP 176 ("bits"), explaining why introducing another sub-unit still forces users to think in decimals and multiple denominations. By adopting an integer-only display, we can provide a clearer, more intuitive, and ultimately more durable representation of Bitcoin’s value.   #9

MORTEZAMIRSALI opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@MORTEZAMIRSALI
Copy link

what has traditionally been called "1 BTC" (100,000,000 base units
@MORTEZAMIRSALI
Copy link
Author

what has traditionally been called "1 BTC" (100,000,000 base units

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@MORTEZAMIRSALI