You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 26, 2025. It is now read-only.
At the moment the scores of the parameters are returned to the master process. We should also have a way to e.g. get the raw efeature values out. This would be useful for sensitivity analysis e.g.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I will see when I have time to implement this. It won't be trivial, because it involves some changes to the current user-facing API. I'll try to implement in a way so that it doesn't affect existing scripts.
Ok, I see. Another solution would be to re-run models (>10, potentially hundreds parameter combinations). Maybe this can be efficiently done in parallel (using multiprocessing or ipyparallel), by re-using existing code.
Yes, for now that might be the best solution. You could use the ipyparallel map function for that. You would only have to pass a function that returns the feature values instead of the scores.
Another option is to subclass response or score calculator classes and let them write out the feature values they see to files.
At the moment the scores of the parameters are returned to the master process. We should also have a way to e.g. get the raw efeature values out. This would be useful for sensitivity analysis e.g.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: