You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hiding unnecessary details when all that is wanted is an overview of how types are related.
Potential Solution
Add a --hide option which accepts: fields, methods, constructors, synthetics.
I think we would still want to include the associations between types and so this should remain as a rendering option rather than something that the processor needs to know about.
Additional Information
This will solve part of #14 as it provides a way of hiding the constructors.
The default value of --hide will be synthetics so we should also add a --show option which can undo this default. It could also be useful if we provide "presets" which are easier to customise than specifying all the options manually, similar to what is available in the core API.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You may also want to discuss this in Ideas.
Description
I'd like to be able to hide class members.
Hiding unnecessary details when all that is wanted is an overview of how types are related.
Potential Solution
Add a
--hide
option which accepts:fields
,methods
,constructors
,synthetics
.I think we would still want to include the associations between types and so this should remain as a rendering option rather than something that the processor needs to know about.
Additional Information
This will solve part of #14 as it provides a way of hiding the constructors.
The default value of
--hide
will besynthetics
so we should also add a--show
option which can undo this default. It could also be useful if we provide "presets" which are easier to customise than specifying all the options manually, similar to what is available in the core API.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: