use of AI for writing and during publishing process

[biumiamy]

• example about use of AI assistance in writing process (guideline p. 6 or [online here](The use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in scientific writing))

• AI in editorial process (see example here)

• AI in review process (see example here)

• AI for figures (see example here)

[eliselavy]

From Nature journal:

https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/initial-submission

Authors. Corresponding author(s) should be identified with an asterisk. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, do not currently satisfy our authorship criteria. Notably an attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to LLMs. Use of an LLM should be properly documented in the Methods section (and if a Methods section is not available, in a suitable alternative part) of the manuscript.

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00191-1

ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00107-z

[biumiamy]

two articles mentioned by Andreas:

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2023/08/08/ai-can-crack-double-blind-peer-review-should-we-still-use-it/
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/05/17/can-ai-be-used-ethically-to-assist-peer-review/