Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Statutes' motion type doesn't allow initiators to merge amendments #844

Open
OdyX opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Statutes' motion type doesn't allow initiators to merge amendments #844

OdyX opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@OdyX
Copy link

OdyX commented Sep 29, 2023

In our case, we have our base, old statutes, that we want to update. About 25 modifications were proposed, so now we want to proceed in two steps:

  1. first merge the "consensual" changes (cleanup, vocabulary, etc)
  2. bring that new version to vote, then proceed to vote on all other changes individually

From the documentation (which doesn't make that "Statutes vs normal" distinction), over at https://discuss.green/help#merging_single, it seems that I should be able to uphold amendments between the two steps above (so that I can get a new version without having to re-propose all the amendments).

I had to go look in the code and found that the Statutes motionType forces this behaviour out:

$type->initiatorsCanMergeAmendments = ConsultationMotionType::INITIATORS_MERGE_NEVER;

Could this be changed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant