https://app.aave.com/governance/proposal/?proposalId=377
🔧 📊 params-update
This proposal reduces the Liquidation Threshold (LT) and LTV of stMATIC and MATICx on Aave v3 Polygon, on non-eMode.
Transaction: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xfe06fc36e62323ce8d4d635391f218b4602de59c70307cc9da263b0b749bdf00
- id: 377
- creator: 0x683a4f9915d6216f73d6df50151725036bd26c02
- executor: 0xee56e2b3d491590b5b31738cc34d5232f378a8d5
- targets: [0x9aee0b04504cef83a65ac3f0e838d0593bcb2bc7]
- values: [0]
- signatures: [forwardPayloadForExecution((uint256,uint8,address,uint40))]
- calldatas: [0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000890000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001000000000000000000000000401b5d0294e23637c18fcc38b1bca814cda2637c000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000b]
- withDelegatecalls: [false]
- startBlock: 18623092
- endBlock: 18642292
- strategy: 0xb7e383ef9b1e9189fc0f71fb30af8aa14377429e
- ipfsHash: 0x4989045af890034b671390e0bd573cf61bba6d3f20bfbb784abe1c420f7ec95d
Proposal report
Payload report
We have verified the proposal payload properly doing the following updates on Aave v3 Polygon, via the Config Engine:
stMATIC
- LT: 60% -> 56%
MATICx
- LT: 62% -> 58%
The proposal is consistent with the discussions on the Aave governance forum.
✅ The code on the proposal payload corresponds to the proposal specification.
✅ The proposal includes a proper tests suite, checking all necessary post-conditions.
✅ BGD reviewed the payload before the proposal was submitted.
✅ Only one payload used via delegatecall
✅ BGD reviewed the procedure followed to submit the proposal.