Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upd #5511

Closed
wants to merge 136 commits into from
Closed

upd #5511

wants to merge 136 commits into from

Conversation

facefunny
Copy link

@facefunny facefunny commented Sep 23, 2024

💻 变更类型 | Change Type

  • feat
  • fix
  • refactor
  • perf
  • style
  • test
  • docs
  • ci
  • chore
  • build

🔀 变更说明 | Description of Change

📝 补充信息 | Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the scheduled execution time of a workflow to run daily at 6 PM instead of midnight.

facefunny and others added 30 commits September 21, 2023 13:31
actions-user and others added 26 commits August 1, 2024 18:18
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 23, 2024

@facefunny is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the scheduled execution time of a GitHub Actions workflow defined in the .github/workflows/sync.yml file. The cron expression has been modified to change the trigger time from midnight to 6 PM daily. This change solely affects the timing of the workflow execution without any alterations to the workflow's other configurations or exported entities.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/sync.yml Updated cron expression from "0 0 * * *" to "0 18 * * *" for daily execution at 6 PM.

Poem

In the meadow, the sun dips low,
A workflow's rhythm starts to flow.
At six o'clock, the bunnies cheer,
For tasks to run, the time is near!
With hops and skips, we dance with glee,
A brighter schedule, come join with me! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/sync.yml (3)

8-8: LGTM! Consider documenting the timezone impact.

The change from midnight to 6 PM UTC for the daily sync is reasonable and may capture more daily changes.

Consider adding a brief comment about the UTC timezone, as it might affect contributors in different geographical locations. For example:

- - cron: "0 18 * * *" # every day
+ - cron: "0 18 * * *" # every day at 6 PM UTC

Line range hint 25-25: Consider checking for a newer version of the sync action.

The workflow is currently using version 3.4 of the Fork-Sync-With-Upstream-action. It might be beneficial to check if a newer version is available, as it could include bug fixes or performance improvements.

You can check the latest version at the action's repository: https://github.com/aormsby/Fork-Sync-With-Upstream-action


Line range hint 40-43: Consider generalizing the error message.

The error message currently references a specific repository (Yidadaa/ChatGPT-Next-Web). If this workflow file might be used in other forks or projects, it would be more maintainable to use placeholder values for the repository name and URL.

You could update the message like this:

- echo "[Error] 由于上游仓库的 workflow 文件变更,导致 GitHub 自动暂停了本次自动更新,你需要手动 Sync Fork 一次,详细教程请查看:https://github.com/Yidadaa/ChatGPT-Next-Web/blob/main/README_CN.md#%E6%89%93%E5%BC%80%E8%87%AA%E5%8A%A8%E6%9B%B4%E6%96%B0"
- echo "[Error] Due to a change in the workflow file of the upstream repository, GitHub has automatically suspended the scheduled automatic update. You need to manually sync your fork. Please refer to the detailed tutorial for instructions: https://github.com/Yidadaa/ChatGPT-Next-Web#enable-automatic-updates"
+ echo "[Error] 由于上游仓库的 workflow 文件变更,导致 GitHub 自动暂停了本次自动更新,你需要手动 Sync Fork 一次,详细教程请查看项目的 README 文件。"
+ echo "[Error] Due to a change in the workflow file of the upstream repository, GitHub has automatically suspended the scheduled automatic update. You need to manually sync your fork. Please refer to the project's README file for detailed instructions."
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c3fd55 and 8d76a91.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/sync.yml (1 hunks)

@facefunny facefunny closed this Sep 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants