Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp, gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-01-21 #6127

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

dupl
Copy link
Contributor

@dupl dupl commented Feb 2, 2025

πŸ’» ε˜ζ›΄η±»εž‹ | Change Type

  • feat
  • fix
  • refactor
  • perf
  • style
  • test
  • docs
  • ci
  • chore
  • build

πŸ”€ ε˜ζ›΄θ―΄ζ˜Ž | Description of Change

πŸ“ θ‘₯充俑息 | Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Expanded the available AI model options by introducing two new model identifiers: "gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp" and "gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-01-21", offering potentially enhanced capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected a typographical error in the README regarding the OPENAI_API_KEY, improving documentation clarity.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 2, 2025

@dupl is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

The change updates the app/constant.ts file by appending two new entries to the googleModels array. The modifications introduce the identifiers "gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp" and "gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-01-21", expanding the list of recognized models. Additionally, a typographical error in the README_CN.md file was corrected from "OpanAI" to "OpenAI". No existing functionality or logic was altered.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/constant.ts Added "gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp" and "gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-01-21" to googleModels
README_CN.md Corrected typographical error from "OpanAI" to "OpenAI" in the description of OPENAI_API_KEY

Poem

I'm a rabbit bouncing with delight,
New models join the code, so bright!
Two entries hop into the constant field,
A tiny update, yet a joyful yield.
In the land of code where changes play,
I nibble on success throughout the day!
"""


πŸ“œ Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 034b7d4 and 60fa358.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • README_CN.md (1 hunks)
βœ… Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README_CN.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1e20b64 and 034b7d4.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/constant.ts (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +497 to +499
"gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp",
"gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-1219",
"gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-01-21",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

πŸ’‘ Codebase verification

Action Required: Define cutoff dates for new experimental Gemini models.

  • The existing Gemini models (e.g., "gemini-pro" and "gemini-pro-vision") have defined cutoff dates in app/constant.ts.
  • The new experimental models ("gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp", "gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-1219", "gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-01-21") currently lack associated cutoff dates.
  • Please update the KnowledgeCutOffDate record accordingly.
πŸ”— Analysis chain

LGTM! Consider adding knowledge cutoff dates.

The new Gemini model entries follow the existing naming convention and are correctly placed in the googleModels array.

Consider adding knowledge cutoff dates for these new models in the KnowledgeCutOffDate record. Run this script to check if other Gemini models have cutoff dates:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other Gemini models have knowledge cutoff dates defined
rg -A 1 "gemini.*:" app/constant.ts

Length of output: 128

@Leizhenpeng Leizhenpeng merged commit b6881c7 into ChatGPTNextWeb:main Feb 4, 2025
1 check failed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 6, 2025
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants