Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any plan to provide a rust sdk? #3

Open
yangzhao-kl opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Any plan to provide a rust sdk? #3

yangzhao-kl opened this issue Nov 13, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@yangzhao-kl
Copy link

Hello, we are using pacemaker in production and we use rust to develop. Is there any plan to provide a rust sdk?

@MalloZup
Copy link
Contributor

@yangzhao-kl hi! thx for you issue .

I'm interested on your use-cases, what would be the high-level usage of your SDK? I mean if you would provide a list of 5 operations/API you would use with the SDK what they would be?

Thx for your time.

Regarding the rust SDK, I'm evaluating right now having a RUST SDK or go difference regarding the C bindings.

@yangzhao-kl
Copy link
Author

@MalloZup
The rust sdk is still under develop at early stage。
As for the go-pacemaker, is this project come back active again?Maybe we can contribute.

@MalloZup
Copy link
Contributor

@yangzhao-kl it could be that the project start to be active again. For moment I'm evaluating feature doing research on what could be useful on the higher level point of view. if we can have like also from your side what you would useful would be helpfull.

Beside that, yep I think is most probably that between go and rust SDK , I will continue the go development because this library is already used by hawk so I need already to maintain it for other projects.

@jgrund
Copy link

jgrund commented Sep 28, 2022

I'd be very interested in using (and contributing to) Rust api bindings for libpacemaker.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants