You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that you removed the weight that balances the losses of different positions, which is a part of the focal frequency loss.
I wonder why that is. Did you observe a performance degradation?
I'm working on a similar project that involves spectrum reconstruction, and could use your advice. Intuitively, given the unbalanced distribution of the spectrum, the weight seems a good choice.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, from my observation, the results achieved with weight is not so good as that without weight. But it only limits to my experiments, I feel it should depend on specific using case. I encourage you to try both, and use the better in your case.
Hi,
I noticed that you removed the weight that balances the losses of different positions, which is a part of the focal frequency loss.
I wonder why that is. Did you observe a performance degradation?
I'm working on a similar project that involves spectrum reconstruction, and could use your advice. Intuitively, given the unbalanced distribution of the spectrum, the weight seems a good choice.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: