Replies: 3 comments
-
Actually, that may be valid. From the definition of xsd:anyURI:
From RFC 3987:
So it shouldn't necessarily yield a parsing error. But of course any program blindly fetching that URI literal is going to receive a 404. For what it's worth, Protege is smart enough to create a hyperlink only for the URL portion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for pointing this out. This warrants including as a policy whether the accessed date should be preserved in another annotation, or the datatype be changed, or access date dropped. Looking more broadly, the only other terms that mention the accessed date are dc terms bibliographic citation, in which the access date is of course warranted. This is the only case where an access date is used with the annotation cco:definition_source. This also raises the issue of making sure that external URIs are routinely checked to make sure no terms point to dead links or links to webpages which have changed that do not reflect the definition. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As we improve definition sources, it is also under discussion what value we should have to our definition source annotation properties, and this will be clarified and fixed when that occurs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The cco:definition_source on line 12454 has a type of xsd:anyURI. However the string for the definition_source reads "https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/cryosphere.html (accessed 03/06/2023)". The "(accessed 03/06/2023)" portion of the value needs to be removed in order for the ontology to not experience a parsing error.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions