Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Artifact signing #3

Open
philpennock opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Artifact signing #3

philpennock opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@philpennock
Copy link
Contributor

philpennock commented Feb 7, 2022

We need a coherent public story around artifact signing and verification for our client tools.

The story should describe the threat model we are protecting against. What points in the delivery chain are protected against what type of attacker by having signatures and verifying them. Is undesirable write to CF KV store more or less likely than GitHub Secrets disclosure (eg, via bad workflow)? What about GitHub Artifact Hosting vs GitHub Secrets?

This includes versioned builds and nightlies.

My tentative thinking is a cosign key which lives in GitHub Secrets in the nats-io and CE orgs. Not sure if we should have a separate stable and a nightly signer, or one key for both. If we use cosign then we can sign checksum files and docker images.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant