Updates required to a property and the example provided in EnergyPlanSolarFeedInTariff schema

[NeelVerma]

Description

Update required to a property and the provided example in EnergyPlanSolarFeedInTariff schema.

Area Affected

• Affected URL > https://consumerdatastandardsaustralia.github.io/standards/#tocSenergyplansolarfeedintariff
• The "Type", "Description" and associated example of the property "timeVaryingTariffs" should mention that it is an array.
• The provided example shows "timevaryingTariffs" with a "tariffUType" of "singleTariff" which is incorrect as "timevaryingTariffs" is conditional, it is mandatory when the "tariffUType" is set to "timeVaryingTariffs".

Change Proposed

• Please update the "Type", "Description" and associated example of the property "timeVaryingTariffs" to indicate that it is an array.
• Please update the "tariffUType" in the given example to "timevaryingTariffs" as "timevaryingTariffs" is conditional, it is mandatory when the "tariffUType" is set to "timeVaryingTariffs".
• Please refer to the following link with detailed information from @joe-parkin-aer from Australian Energy Regulator (AER) about this object previously, another suggestion would be to use a combined example to cover this scenario as mentioned here --> [https://github.com/Decision Proposal 190 - Candidate Generic Tariff End Points standards#190#issuecomment-927507635]
• Please refer to the attached image with the requested changes highlighted:

[mattyp]

+1

This is duplicate of #624 (comment)

[nils-work]

Hi @NeelVerma
Re: your proposed changes:

Please update the "Type", "Description" and associated example of the property "timeVaryingTariffs" to indicate that it is an array.

This was resolved in Standards version 1.30.0 when EnergyPlanSolarFeedInTariffV3 was introduced.

Please update the "tariffUType" in the given example to "timevaryingTariffs" as "timevaryingTariffs" is conditional, it is mandatory when the "tariffUType" is set to "timeVaryingTariffs".

The Non-normative example demonstrates the full structure of all properties in the schema.
As both the singleTariff and timeVaryingTariffs fields are conditionally mandatory based on the value of tariffUType, singleTariff is a valid value and simply demonstrates the first enum option that references that structure.

Please comment if I've misunderstood your concerns or if this issue can now be closed.

I have also noted that there appears to be a copy/paste error in the Description of the tariffUType field which can be addressed in Maintenance Iteration 20.

[nils-work]

If there are no further comments, this issue will be closed on 30 August 2024.