You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As noted in the MI20 Holistic issue, all UType field descriptions could follow a standardised format for consistency and improved interpretation.
Apply the change noted in the MI20 holistic feedback issue:
The "Reference to the applicable [type] structure." convention could be applied to all ...UType field descriptions for consistency and clarity of interpretation.
The following sample shows the current variation across schemas:
The type of recurrence used to define the schedule.
The type of structure to present account specific fields.
Indicator of the type of transaction object present in this record
The type of address object present
The type of object present in this response (from EnergyPaymentSchedule)
Type of object included that describes the payee in detail.
As noted in the MI20 Holistic issue, all UType field descriptions could follow a standardised format for consistency and improved interpretation.
Apply the change noted in the MI20 holistic feedback issue:
This style was applied to the field noted here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: