-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cannot get the output segmentation in the paper with the provided weight file #6
Comments
I'll take a look at it today!
Dave
David Van Valen MD, PhD
Postdoctoral Scholar, Covert Lab
Stanford University
…On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:27 PM, opnumten ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
with the provided weight file, I cannot get the output images shown in
your PLOS paper. The prediction accuracy is pretty low.
Thanks
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKYa9hWacS3smxsWR_-jiCUJ0rcU7E5dks5r6KckgaJpZM4NblEB>
.
|
Hi, Valen~ |
I'm seeing similar..i'm using just the trained network provided and the validation data provided (HeLa) But when i run it on the docker i pulled does anyone know why this would happen? |
I'm taking a look at it.
Dave
David Van Valen MD, PhD
Postdoctoral Scholar, Covert Lab
Stanford University
…On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Hsieh-Fu Tsai ***@***.***> wrote:
I'm seeing similar..i'm using just the trained network provided and the
validation data provided (HeLa)
The Jaccard index and dice index provided in the original jupyter notebook
suggest:
Jaccard index is 0.84462 +/- 0.0107597496164
Dice index is 0.914696973088 +/- 0.00655002244584
But when i run it on the docker i pulled
the indexes are only:
Jaccard index is 0.700539 +/- 0.144342
Dice index is 0.814186574197 +/- 0.115389352237b
does anyone know why this would happen?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKYa9va4Om5FmApZBPhwbQ8piI-NnU2Eks5sF3J7gaJpZM4NblEB>
.
|
Hi Dave, Thank you so much for your time! I'm sure it'll be extremely useful for my work if we can take a ride on your platform. |
I'm not quite sure what the issue is, but the fastest fix is to train new
neural networks for the HeLa cells. They should be ready in a day or so.
David Van Valen MD, PhD
Postdoctoral Scholar, Covert Lab
Stanford University
…On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Hsieh-Fu Tsai ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Dave, Thank you so much for your time! I'm sure it'll be extremely
useful for my work if we can take a ride on your platform.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKYa9iNihC7bHxF5T-c8l0tQHdbfZbNdks5sGXsIgaJpZM4NblEB>
.
|
Hi,
with the provided weight file, I cannot get the output images shown in your PLOS paper. The prediction accuracy is pretty low.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: