Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question about evaluation. #17

Open
tt6746690 opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

question about evaluation. #17

tt6746690 opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@tt6746690
Copy link

Thanks for the awesome project!

I have a few questions:

  • I wonder how would VCD perform on LLaVA suite of benchmarks that is not focused on hallucination, e.g., GQA, ScienceQA, TextVQA, etc. Would it incur a performance hit on these benchmarks because the VLM uses less language prior?
  • Why use MME to evaluate hallucination, in contrast to other VQA benchmarks?
@LengSicong
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, thanks for your interest.

Actually, MME is a general benchmark like GQA that evaluates LVLMs across different categories. Our results on MME show that VCD may have benefits for perception-related general VQA, but not for reasoning-related ones.

For evaluating hallucinations, our main benchmark is POPE. However, since it only focuses on object hallucinations, we additionally adopt several subsets from MME, where they evaluate LVLMs' perception capabilities in counting and relational recognition, as supplementary data for broader hallucination evaluation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants