Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Call for Reviews] Establishing central RSE units in German research institutions #20

Open
knarrff opened this issue Feb 23, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@knarrff
Copy link

knarrff commented Feb 23, 2025

Position paper process

Abstract

This position paper urges decision makers in Germany to establish central RSE units within their institutions.
Focus is not put primarily on the establishment of RSE services in general, as this has been done already elsewhere.
Instead, motivations for especially central RSE units are discussed, underpinned by working examples both in neighbouring fields as well as outside of Germany.
The heart of this paper is a vision of a central RSE unit, it's structure, and the definition of nine core support modules such a unit may provide.
An initial survey finds that there is considerable diversity within the module distribution, even within the few considered groups.
Initial observations on possible clusters are discussed, but need further studies.
Finally, realisation strategies are discussed.
While this paper focuses mostly on the German academic environment, some general strategies should also apply elsewhere.

Position paper links

Where/how to comment

  • either here (in this issue within the positions repo), or
  • as issue or even pull request on the git repo of the paper.
@knarrff knarrff self-assigned this Feb 23, 2025
@annalenalamprecht
Copy link

Thanks for this initiative, and for pushing this important topic to broader attention!

From a quick look at the text, I was wondering how this relates to the whole NFDI developments. Currently it is only mentioned in the RDM section, but from what I hear (I am not an active member of any NFDI consortium myself), its scope has become broader and also addresses research software aspects. I am sure that several key stakeholders from research policy / funding who are the target audience of this paper will also have questions about this, so I guess it's advisable to be very clear about this.

@axel-loewe
Copy link

Thanks for leading this!

In Figure 1: what does the relative size of the pieces of the pie indicate? Self-assessed number of hours spent on these activities?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants