-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cysteines number does not match the actual input #78
Comments
Hi, thanks for reaching out. I'm not sure I understand the question. The pocket atm pdb's contain only atoms contacted by the alpha spheres defining the binding site. So it is reasonable that pocket 1 is different from 155. |
Hello, thanks for answering and apologize for the unclear reporting. While inspecting the contents of pocket1_atm.pdb and pocket155_atm.pdb I noticed a discrepancy with the number of cysteines reported: the former has three (CYS 418, CYS 9303, CYS 9109) while the latter has 1 (CYS 9307). Just because the alpha spheres contact the residues that define the cavity, the command line output should not match the number of "CYS" in the pocket(xyz)_atm.pdb file l ? While icontent <style> </style>
|
ah indeed it should then - sorry, lost track of this issue :( |
The number of cysteine (2) does not match what reported in cavity number 155 (pocket155_atm.pdb) (0) with the highest drug score. Similarly, cavity number 1 (pocket1_atm.pdb) has the same problem (6 cysteines written but 3 in the output file).
This issue may be extended to the number of other specific residues.
the command code used is:
the content of pocket155_atm.pdb is:
the content of pocket1_atm.pdb is:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: