Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Schema and example election record with use of range Chaum-Pedersen proofs and no placeholder selections are needed #292

Open
1 task done
eionblanc opened this issue Aug 18, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request triage Waiting to be triaged

Comments

@eionblanc
Copy link

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Suggestion

In spirit of the specification leading the code, there needs to be a defined schema for election records using the upcoming range Chaum-Pedersen proofs for both selection encryption proofs and contest limit proofs as well as reflecting the upcoming elimination of placeholders. An example election record should be provided as well.

Possible Implementation

Changes relative to other schemas will primarily be in ciphertext and submitted ballots (for the proofs and eliminated placeholders) as well as the manifest (for the detailing of selection and contest limits aligned with contest vote variation).

Anything else?

Since these features are upcoming, the new schema should augment and not replace the existing schemas for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request triage Waiting to be triaged
Projects
None yet
1 participant