You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This page wasn't updated to the best of Joel's knowledge. Why is there a rollercoaster? New issues shouldn't have been added or fixed after the fact. What went wrong where? And how can we fix it?
@bbertucc This one is tricky... deals with how we're processing scans in general. We'll have to run through the lifecycle of a scan, test, and see what's going on. My hunch is 6 hours.
@heythisischris would it help if we approve an hour or two for investigation to get at a better understanding of what is going on? I imagine we'll need to run the URL over 2-3 different days and track where the issue is starting before you come up with a fix.
If that is the case, I would be curious to know what you're looking at over the amount of time you need to determine where the issue is.
@heythisischris said that 2 hours is reasonable on our call to get a sense of the problem. He'll then post a summary of the problem and additional notes on how to fix with a budget for that. Approved.
Overview
This page wasn't updated to the best of Joel's knowledge. Why is there a rollercoaster? New issues shouldn't have been added or fixed after the fact. What went wrong where? And how can we fix it?
Here is the URL: https://registrar.duke.edu
Here is a screenshot:
Bountied
Since this is a bountied issue, Assignees should post an estimate that is then approved as per this note in the handbook: https://github.com/EqualifyEverything/handbook?tab=readme-ov-file#how-are-bounties-budgeted
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: