Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Write better test coverage for attributes #31

Open
ErichDonGubler opened this issue Sep 5, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Write better test coverage for attributes #31

ErichDonGubler opened this issue Sep 5, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@ErichDonGubler
Labels
good first issue help wanted tech debt
Milestone
Support most vali...

Comments

@ErichDonGubler
Copy link
Owner

Until now, the only tests written for attributes ensure that they are accepted, but don't test if the attributes actually come through parsing into the final fn definition. It would be good if we could find a way to functionally test this, and make sure the contract! macro isn't actually eating any attributes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ErichDonGubler ErichDonGubler

Labels
good first issue help wanted tech debt
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Support most valid `fn` definitions
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ErichDonGubler