-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Openfast 4.0 coupling #1476
Comments
Good news, we found the bug. It is in openfast: https://github.com/OpenFAST/openfast/blob/89358f1843b62071ee1a8ca943c1b5277bcbd45a/modules/externalinflow/src/ExternalInflow.f90#L426. Should be 9+1 not 9_1. Openfast devs are working on it. |
Openfast bug fix: OpenFAST/openfast#2628 |
Latest results using OpenFAST ExtInflow with TL;DR: Blade position now looks correct and the wakes look reasonable, but the turbine performance should be a closer match than this. Details for test case setup at https://gist.github.com/lawrenceccheung/aba7ae79738d9a08270648a0ca8eb07a |
Nice!! |
Spack update: spack/spack#48994 |
OpenFAST release 4.0.2 with fix: https://github.com/OpenFAST/openfast/releases/tag/v4.0.2 Thanks for testing it and verifying the fix works! |
Bug description
Openfast 4.0 coupling seems to be giving different answers than when using Openfast 3.5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: