Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/easynetworkmanager #54

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ZanzyTHEbar
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request simplifies the code base and migrates the entire network stack to my custom library EasyNetworkManager - which was originally inspired by the network stack I made for OpenIris.

Along with migrating the network stack notable changes are:

  • API class that acts as agnostic facade for all handlers that need to execute api methods
  • migrated stream server to AsyncWebServer (to be tested, it should hold up - but we need to make sure)
  • wifimanager (feature that is in the new network stack) is enabled by default, provided a light-weight HTML file at /wifimanager to set Wifi credentials. Instead of users having to use the REST API.

- total project refactor and simplification
- getting closer
- total refactor of state manager, rest api, and camera handler
- getting closer
- total refactor of state manager, rest api, and camera handler, led_manager
@ZanzyTHEbar ZanzyTHEbar requested a review from lorow June 22, 2023 15:52
@ZanzyTHEbar ZanzyTHEbar self-assigned this Jun 22, 2023
@ZanzyTHEbar ZanzyTHEbar added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 22, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@lorow lorow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, yeah, holy crap. This is HUGE, I love it!

It's a lot of really good work, thank you! It's good to see the things we've been talking about that we wanted to finally tackle and rewrite/fix or outright remove got taken care of, things are looking way better now!

@ZanzyTHEbar ZanzyTHEbar requested a review from lorow October 19, 2023 13:24
@lorow
Copy link
Collaborator

lorow commented Oct 19, 2023

Looks really good to me. The only thing I'm worried about is the async streaming server as the last time I tried that, it didn't work that great for some users. But we can't know without trying, eh?

So, we ready to merge? :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants