Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Figure 5 missing in architecture spec? #56

Closed
LourensVeen opened this issue Oct 14, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Figure 5 missing in architecture spec? #56

LourensVeen opened this issue Oct 14, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@LourensVeen
Copy link

On https://github.com/FAIRDataTeam/FAIRDataPoint/wiki/FAIR-Data-Point-Specification, there's a very well-written description of what a FAIR DataPoint is and does, but the picture for Figure 5 appears to be missing. That's a shame, because it's kind of the keystone.

Figures 1, 3 and 4 do show for me, in case it's a technical problem and not just an accidental omission.

Could someone add the picture or point me to it if it's available elsewhere? Thanks!

@arnikz
Copy link
Contributor

arnikz commented Oct 22, 2019

Perhaps, you're looking for this one (Fig. 4)? AFAIR it was the "original" FDP spec site as referred by the corresponding repo here (or RSD entry). After all, it's not really such a shame;-)

@LourensVeen
Copy link
Author

Yes, looks like that's it, thanks!

Would still be good if someone could put it on the wiki page, it doesn't look like I can do that.

@LourensVeen
Copy link
Author

I see now that this page is considered an archived copy, and that the spec has moved to https://github.com/FAIRDataTeam/FAIRDataPoint-Spec, where the figure is also broken. I'll make a separate issue there, although from a comment on FAIRDataTeam/FAIRDataPoint-Spec#15, it seems that architecture is not the main interest.

@LourensVeen
Copy link
Author

LourensVeen commented Nov 5, 2019

It's FAIRDataTeam/FAIRDataPoint-Spec#17 now, and also FAIRDataTeam/FAIRDataPoint-Spec#18. I'm closing this, since this repository is archived and it's probably not worth fixing here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants