Use GO-FAIR FAIR principles in F A I R terms

[FuqiX]

Hi, @proccaserra .

I was checking the Findaiblity, accessibility, interoperability, reusability terms in the ontology. I wonder if it okay to use terms in the GO-FAIR principle description, rather than creating new child terms?

For example, currently we have

|accessibility
    |----access-control
    |----encalved

I am thinking about changing it to FAIR principle terms. (The wording can be improved)

|accessibility
     |----retrievable using standardised protocol (A1: (Meta)data are retrievable by their identifier using a standardised communication protocol)
            |----using open protocol (A1.1: The protocol is open, free and universally implementable)
            |----supporing authentication and authorisation (A1.2: The protocol allows for an authentication and authorisation where necessary)

Please let me know if this makes sense to you. I can work on this ticket.

Fuqi

[proccaserra]

Hi Fuqi,
I think it that's the gist yes, the suggested additions complements the first pass terms. please add to the google spreadsheet, we can work on the synonyms, definition class metadata there.
We should probably split the 'term' from the principle itself.
cheers
P