Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[VPP-537] vpp dropping ping frames when using option -s2003 (or above) #1886

Open
vvalderrv opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@vvalderrv
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Testing jumbo frames between two VMs on two different compute hosts, I wasn't able to send frames over a bond sub-interface using values >= 2003.

Used 'trace add' and 'show trace' commands on receiving vpp, using -s2002 (or less) I see the icmp requests and response packets. Above 2002 I don't see any ICMP frames being captured. I did notice sending pings >= 2003 that the parent bond interface displayed, via 'show hard BondInterface0' command, that the 'rx missed' counter was incrementing.

Using:

vpp# sho ver

vpp v16.09 built by jenkins on centos-7-805 at Fri Sep 16 23:58:34 UTC 2016

Assignee

Andrew Yourtchenko

Reporter

Rich Curran

Comments

  • florin.coras (Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:31:13 +0000): Thanks, Andrew!
  • ayourtch (Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:35:05 +0000): 61459c9 made it such that the ping data size is limited by VLIB_BUFFER_DATA_SIZE, which is 2048. So I would expect this to still not work (as a limitation), but this time with an error message. So I have reclassified this as an improvement. The patches are welcome course!
  • florin.coras (Tue, 17 Oct 2017 01:50:25 +0000): Andrew Yourtchenko, is this still an issue in 17.10?
  • tiswanso (Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:15:02 +0000): This is seen on Cisco UCS VIC 1227

(Rich and my environment)

Original issue: https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-537

@vvalderrv
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, Andrew!

@vvalderrv
Copy link
Contributor Author

61459c9 made it such that the ping data size is limited by VLIB_BUFFER_DATA_SIZE, which is 2048. So I would expect this to still not work (as a limitation), but this time with an error message. So I have reclassified this as an improvement. The patches are welcome course!

@vvalderrv
Copy link
Contributor Author

Andrew Yourtchenko, is this still an issue in 17.10?

@vvalderrv
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is seen on Cisco UCS VIC 1227

(Rich and my environment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant