From c6e958d033d83437e87a258c13754b19d620b466 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luther Tychonievich Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:16:59 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Update _pages/techfaqs.md --- _pages/techfaqs.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_pages/techfaqs.md b/_pages/techfaqs.md index a55c90f..dad442b 100644 --- a/_pages/techfaqs.md +++ b/_pages/techfaqs.md @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ At present, the best available tool is `INDI.FAMC.PEDI`, one for each family: Because the nature of `BIRTH` is unclear (is it about the biological progenitors of the child or the social family unit into which it is born?) and a topic some researchers have strong feelings about, either or both of the above may be recorded `PEDI OTHER` instead of `PEDI BIRTH` by some researchers. -# How do I provide a source citaton for a parent-child relationship? +# How do I provide a source citation for a parent-child relationship? Neither the `FAMC` structure of an individual record nor the `CHIL` structure of a family record supports having a `SOUR` citation as a substructure. Today applications often put the `SOUR` directly under the