references.bib

@misc{pargent2022new,
 title={New Insights into PCA + Varimax for Psychological Researchers: A short commentary on Rohe & Zeng (2022)},
 url={psyarxiv.com/pfkav},
 DOI={10.31234/osf.io/pfkav},
 publisher={PsyArXiv},
 author={Pargent, Florian and Goretzko, David and von Oertzen, Timo},
 year={2022},
 month={Jun}
}

@article{yarkoni2020implicit,
	title = {Implicit {Realism} {Impedes} {Progress} in {Psychology}: {Comment} on {Fried} (2020)},
	volume = {31},
	issn = {1047-840X, 1532-7965},
	shorttitle = {Implicit {Realism} {Impedes} {Progress} in {Psychology}},
	url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1853478},
	doi = {10.1080/1047840X.2020.1853478},
	language = {en},
	number = {4},
	urldate = {2022-06-08},
	journal = {Psychological Inquiry},
	author = {Yarkoni, Tal},
	month = oct,
	year = {2020},
	pages = {326--333},
}

@article{arendasy_manual_2011,
  title = {Manual {{Big}}-{{Five Structure Inventory BFSI}}},
  journaltitle = {Schuhfried Gmbh, Mödling},
  author = {Arendasy, M. and Sommer, M. and Feldhammer, M.},
  date = {2011}
}

@article{vanderlinden2010general,
	title = {The {General} {Factor} of {Personality}: {A} meta-analysis of {Big} {Five} intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study},
	volume = {44},
	issn = {00926566},
	shorttitle = {The {General} {Factor} of {Personality}},
	url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092656610000346},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jrp.2010.03.003},
	abstract = {Recently, it has been proposed that a General Factor of Personality (GFP) occupies the top of the hierarchical personality structure. We present a meta-analysis (K = 212, total N = 144,117) on the intercorrelations among the Big Five personality factors (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism) to test for the existence of a GFP. In addition, we report a multi-method validity study testing the relationship between the GFP and supervisor-rated job performance. The meta-analysis provided supporting evidence for the two meta-factors Stability and Plasticity (or a and b, respectively) and a GFP at the highest hierarchal level. The validity study indicated that the GFP has a substantive component as it is related to supervisor-rated job performance.},
	language = {en},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2022-05-06},
	journal = {Journal of Research in Personality},
	author = {van der Linden, Dimitri and te Nijenhuis, Jan and Bakker, Arnold B.},
	month = jun,
	year = {2010},
	pages = {315--327},
}


@article{stachl2020predicting,
	title = {Predicting personality from patterns of behavior collected with smartphones},
	volume = {117},
	issn = {10916490},
	url = {www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1920484117},
	doi = {10.1073/pnas.1920484117},
	number = {30},
	journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
	author = {Stachl, Clemens and Au, Quay and Schoedel, Ramona and Gosling, Samuel D and Harari, Gabriella M and Buschek, Daniel and Völkel, Sarah Theres and Schuwerk, Tobias and Oldemeier, Michelle and Ullmann, Theresa and Hussmann, Heinrich and Bischl, Bernd and Bühner, Markus},
	month = jul,
	year = {2020},
	pmid = {32665436},
	note = {Publisher: National Academy of Sciences},
	keywords = {Behavior, Machine learning, Mobile sensing, Personality, Privacy},
	pages = {17680--17687},
}

@article{fokkema2017how,
	title = {How {Performing} {PCA} and {CFA} on the {Same} {Data} {Equals} {Trouble}: {Overfitting} in the {Assessment} of {Internal} {Structure} and {Some} {Editorial} {Thoughts} on {It}},
	volume = {33},
	issn = {1015-5759, 2151-2426},
	shorttitle = {How {Performing} {PCA} and {CFA} on the {Same} {Data} {Equals} {Trouble}},
	url = {https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000460},
	doi = {10.1027/1015-5759/a000460},
	language = {en},
	number = {6},
	urldate = {2022-05-06},
	journal = {European Journal of Psychological Assessment},
	author = {Fokkema, Marjolein and Greiff, Samuel},
	month = nov,
	year = {2017},
	pages = {399--402},
}

@article{kaiser1958varimax,
	title = {The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis},
	volume = {23},
	issn = {0033-3123, 1860-0980},
	url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02289233},
	doi = {10.1007/BF02289233},
	language = {en},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2022-05-06},
	journal = {Psychometrika},
	author = {Kaiser, Henry F.},
	month = sep,
	year = {1958},
	pages = {187--200},
}

@book{thurstone1947multiple,
	address = {Chicago,  IL,  US},
	series = {Multiple-factor analysis; a development and expansion of {The} {Vectors} of {Mind}.},
	title = {Multiple-factor analysis; a development and expansion of {The} {Vectors} of {Mind}.},
	abstract = {This book presents a review of the work on multiple-factor analysis done in the past decade by Thurstone and his associates, and it presents in coherent fashion the mathematical development of multiple-factor analysis. The present book includes most of the material that was present in "The Vectors of Mind" (see 9: 5998). Much of the book is spent on methods of factorial analysis using examples which tend to point out clearly the problems involved. There is detailed discussion of various controversial areas. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)},
	publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
	author = {Thurstone, L. L.},
	year = {1947},
	note = {Pages: xix, 535},
}

@misc{rohe2022vintage,
 title={Vintage Factor Analysis with Varimax Performs Statistical Inference}, 
 author={Karl Rohe and Muzhe Zeng},
 year={2022},
 journal={Preprint read before the Royal Statistical Society on 11 May}
}