-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 335
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal for an Alternative to Moq Library #2277
Comments
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We will look to remove Moq from flow. |
This issue is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days. |
So what has happened w.r.t. Moq since then ? |
Current version we are using is safe, we disabled auto-update on this dependency and will remove/replace it in the future. |
This issue is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days. |
Dear Flow Launcher Team,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to discuss a concern regarding the recent behavior of the Moq library, specifically starting from version 4.20. It has come to our attention that this library has exhibited behavior resembling that of malware, sending unauthorized emails from Git to cloud services. As Flow Launcher project currently utilizes version 4.18.4, which is considered safe, I recommend refraining from updating to the problematic versions.
In light of this situation, I would like to propose the exploration of alternative mocking libraries for Flow Launcher project. Given the critical role of mocking in testing and development processes, it is imperative to maintain a high level of security and reliability.
More information:
https://github.com/moq/moq/issues/1370
https://github.com/moq/moq/issues/1372
https://www.reddit.com/r/dotnet/comments/15ljdcc/does_moq_in_its_latest_version_extract_and_send/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: