-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integration with Sphinx #662
Comments
Did you get anywhere? I would be interested in helping with this. |
There's also this discussion started by @jalvesz. |
I think there's basically two parts to getting this working:
A third aspect might be converting the existing Ford HTML templates into a roughly equivalent Sphinx theme. Step 1 would let us manually write something like: .. fortran:function: foo
Some function foo
:param integer, intent(in) a: first argument
:param integer, intent(inout) b: second argument
:return: the foo of a and b
:rtype: integer and step 2 would convert Ford classes into that text. @jalvesz, @clatim, @astroDimitrios if you're all still interested in working on this, I'd be happy to give you write access to the repo so we could better collaborate -- maybe we have a call in the new year to discuss? My email is in my profile if you want to get in touch. |
I had indeed started to work on this here https://github.com/jalvesz/fspx (I just made it public to help this discussion) it is in a very drafty state and currently doesn't use FORD but fparser2 as the backend. I wouldn't mind at all dropping that project in order to improve FORD to make it a sphinx extension.
|
@ZedThree I would still like to help with this, you have my email and a meeting in the new year sounds good :) |
It would be nice if Ford had a way to easily integrate its API docs with Sphinx based user docs. Will get back to this when I'm home from RSECon!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: