Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add foot routing on public transport platforms. #1945

Closed
1 task done
dreirund opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

Add foot routing on public transport platforms. #1945

dreirund opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@dreirund
Copy link

dreirund commented Jan 13, 2025

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Feature/Enhancement Proposal

Public transport platforms are areas where pedestrians can walk. Naturally, no paths/ footways are mapped on them.

It would be helpful if it does.

Additional context

Example: This routing URL,
Screenshot:
image

Further remarks

Regarding the consern:

In NL railway platforms are a restricted area, generally behind some form of gate and that require a valid transport ticket

I think this should be handled by assigning OSM tag access=customers to platforms:

The difference between access=customers and access=private is that in the former case, to use the facility, one has to be a customer of something i.e. buy a ticket. In the second case, a limited number of people have access to the facility, e.g. residents of a neighborhood, school students.

@koebi
Copy link
Collaborator

koebi commented Jan 17, 2025

Hey,
foot routing is allowed on PT platforms, compare this route:

Image

Closed as duplicate of #1944

@koebi koebi closed this as completed Jan 17, 2025
@dreirund
Copy link
Author

dreirund commented Jan 17, 2025

foot routing is allowed on PT platforms, compare this route:

Interesting.

What is the reason that in my example it does not work?

Closed as duplicate of #1944

#1944 is another issue, it does not involve public transport platforms but just a normal area highway that is defined as a relation.

Why do you think that #1945 is a duplicate of #1944?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants