You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We recently ran the command line pixel drill on 5 sites of 9 pixels each (5 3x3 spots) to return NBAR and FC reading across all available bands between 1987 and 2015. We specified that the drill use PQA filtering. The command used was:
while read lat lon; do echo "Retrieving time series for $lat / $lon" ; retrieve_pixel_time_series.py --lon $lon --lat $lat --acq-min 1987-06 --acq-max 2015-10 --satellite LS5 LS7 LS8 --mask-pqa-apply --dataset-type ARG25 --hide-no-data --output-directory $PWD --overwrite ; done <pixels.txt
We have found that the pixel drill results for adjacent pixels have quite different dates in their time series. We expect some, but are finding that there is much more than we expected. Can we check that the drill is retrieving all results in the time series repeatably?
Norman
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We recently ran the command line pixel drill on 5 sites of 9 pixels each (5 3x3 spots) to return NBAR and FC reading across all available bands between 1987 and 2015. We specified that the drill use PQA filtering. The command used was:
while read lat lon; do echo "Retrieving time series for $lat / $lon" ; retrieve_pixel_time_series.py --lon $lon --lat $lat --acq-min 1987-06 --acq-max 2015-10 --satellite LS5 LS7 LS8 --mask-pqa-apply --dataset-type ARG25 --hide-no-data --output-directory $PWD --overwrite ; done <pixels.txt
We have found that the pixel drill results for adjacent pixels have quite different dates in their time series. We expect some, but are finding that there is much more than we expected. Can we check that the drill is retrieving all results in the time series repeatably?
Norman
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: